WASHINGTON (AP) -- Atlantic City's casino industry finds itself
in an odd position in the latest national political dispute over
gambling: on the sidelines.
That's because the debate is over a form of gambling -- betting
on the outcome of sporting events -- offered only in Nevada. And New
Jersey's chance to approve sports betting came and went years ago.
The 1992 Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act,
sponsored by New Jersey Sen. Bill Bradley, banned sports wagering
in the 47 states where it was not then legal.
Nevada got an exemption. So did Oregon, which allows betting on
pro football through a lottery. Delaware got an exemption because
voters approved a 1976 referendum, but the state never adopted
sports betting.
New Jersey, meanwhile, was given a one-year window to decide
whether to sanction sports gambling in Atlantic City. Some
lawmakers in Trenton saw in sports betting a chance to close a
deficit in the casino revenue fund, which financed programs for the
elderly and disabled.
Legislation was introduced to permit sports betting only on
professional teams, and only at Atlantic City casinos. Needed in
both houses of the legislature was a three-fifths vote of approval,
which would have set up a statewide referendum on changing the
state constitution to permit sports betting.
Opponents of sports betting, including Bradley and Bergen County
Executive Pat Schuber, fought the legislation by forming the New
Jersey Coalition to Ban State-Sponsored Sports Betting.
The Senate passed the legislation, but it stalled in the
Assembly. Casino proponents made a last-ditch plea to the state
Casino Control Commission, but the state Supreme Court ruled that
the commission did not have the authority to authorize sports
betting.
Wallace Barr, chairman of the Casino Association of New Jersey,
said Atlantic City casinos still would like to offer sports betting
but realize that the chance to do so "effective died" when the
Legislature failed to act in 1993.
A member of the House at the time of the debate, Sen. Robert
Torricelli, D-N.J., urged state lawmakers to approve sports betting
when they had the chance. He later pledged to try to overturn the
1992 federal law that bars new states from approving sports
betting. But there have been no efforts in Congress to overturn the
ban.
To the contrary, Congress is now weighing an effort to tighten
the ban on sports betting by outlawing bets on college sports, even
in Nevada where it currently is legal. On Thursday, the Senate
Commerce Committee endorsed the proposal, advancing the legislation
to the full Senate.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the chairman of the Commerce
Committee and a leading force behind the legislation, has said
repeatedly that it's time to close the "Las Vegas loophole" that
exempted Nevada from the 1992 sports betting ban.
But Sen. Richard Bryan, D-Nev., reminded the committee that
Nevada was not the only state to get the chance to offer sports
betting. New Jersey was given the opportunity but declined, he
said.
Still, Bryan lost his battle to derail the legislation on
amateur sports betting, leaving him to accuse his colleagues of
"trying to give Nevada the shaft."